DreamGF, built by DreamAI SRL, a Bucharest-registered company, leads with a specific pitch: an AI girlfriend who can send you on-demand photos, not just text. That’s the core loop, chat plus requestable AI-generated images, with voice messages and voice calls layered on as token-gated extras.

A pricing page that contradicts itself

This is the standout issue in our research, and it’s a first-party problem, not a rumor. Fetching DreamGF’s own pricing page and its own homepage on the same day returned two different tier structures: the pricing page showed a 3-month plan at “$12.99 initial, then $25.99/month,” a monthly plan at “$29.97 initial, then $77.97 per 3 months,” and an annual plan at “$69.99 initial, then $311.88/year,” all auto-renewing at the higher rate after an introductory period. The homepage, separately, advertised flat Bronze/Silver/Gold/Diamond tiers at $9.99, $19.99, $49.99, and $99.99 a month. A third-party review site cited yet another structure closer to $5.99–$12.99/month. We can’t reconcile these into one number, and a review that confidently quoted any single one of them would be misleading you. What we can say: expect an auto-renewing subscription, a separate one-time token system for photos, voice messages, and calls (packs from $2.99 to $179.99), and, per an independent write-up, a countdown-timer urgency device on the pricing page that resets rather than actually expiring, which is a recognized dark-pattern tactic worth going in aware of.

What it actually does

The free tier gives limited daily messages, reported around 10/day, with small increases for consecutive-day streaks, in SFW-only chat. Paid access unlocks NSFW image generation on request, which the site markets directly and unambiguously rather than treating as a hidden feature. Voice messages and calls consume tokens on top of the subscription.

Privacy

DreamGF’s privacy policy commits to retaining data only “as long as necessary” without a fixed timeframe, and, notably, says nothing at all, in either direction, about whether chat or image data is used to train its models. That silence is a gap worth flagging rather than a confirmed red flag in itself: it’s a common omission in this space, but it means you can’t point to a clause and know where you stand. Deactivation is available through an in-account form, though the policy doesn’t confirm a hard erasure timeline. Refunds are excluded outright except where required by law, with the company citing GPU infrastructure costs as the reason.

What users report

DreamGF’s Trustpilot presence is small, a handful of reviews, and leans negative: complaints include AI responses described as generic, image generation that didn’t match what was requested, and a general sense of being overpriced relative to output quality. The sample size is too small to treat as conclusive, but combined with the internal pricing inconsistency, it’s enough to warrant caution before committing to an annual plan.

The bottom line

DreamGF’s core idea — a companion who sends requested photos — is genuinely differentiated, and NSFW image generation via chat request isn’t something every competitor offers. But a company whose own pricing pages disagree with each other, paired with a reported urgency-timer tactic, makes this one to price-check very carefully at checkout rather than trust our number or anyone else’s. If photo-on-request is the feature you actually want, also look at Candy AI’s image and video token system, compared directly in Candy AI vs DreamGF.